ICU without walls = ICU without Data? the Covid-19 deficit

Introduction: Northern Ireland (NI) has 5.5 ICU beds/100 000 population,1 amongst the lowest in Western Europe.2 Alongside ICU bed expansion the Covid-19 response required delivery of advanced Respiratory support (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and High Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO)) outside ICU. ICNARC provides robust data for patients within ICU but this is unavailable for those receiving 'critical care' elsewhere. Objective(s): To evaluate delivery of CPAP/HFNO outside of ICU to Covid-19 patients - focusing on demographics and outcomes including ICU admission and mortality. Method(s): Ward-CPAP for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF) was not previously utilised.3 It was introduced for Covid-19 to Medical wards. Data was analysed using the NI Electronic Care Record, ward electronic note system (EDAMS) and ICU system (ICCA, Koninklijke Philips N.V.). Data was compared between Wave 1 (01/03/2020 - 12/12/2020) and Wave 2 (13/12/2020 - 01/04/2021). Result(s): 215 patients received CPAP/HFNO/Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV) for Covid-19: 103 in Wave 1 and 112 in Wave 2. 75 Covid-19 patients were admitted to the ICU itself (comprising 44 of the study cohort, 11 direct from ED and 20 transferred from other Trusts). Table 1 shows demographics. Fewer patients were female as seen elsewhere,4 there were more young patients in Wave 2. The majority of patients would likely have been ICU candidates pre-pandemic,3 but a subset of 25% were deemed for a ward ceiling-of-care on admission by a Consultant and the proportion of elderly patients was higher than described by ICNARC.4 Comorbidities and obesity were common. Outcomes are shown in Table 2 and Figures 1-3. Close co-operation with ICU saw 61% of patients with a documented ICU review. Overall 20% of patients were admitted to ICU, and 15% received IMV. Mortality was 37%, but 22% if patients with an admission ward ceiling-of-care decision were excluded. Mortality correlated with frailty and age (fig 2&3). Outcomes were generally better in Wave 2. Conclusion(s): This Evaluation documents the huge contribution to the critical care Covid-19 response made by our Medical teams, not captured by ICNARC. Most patients avoided ICU admission and IMV and outcomes were likely at least comparable which undoubtedly freed up vital ICU beds. We thank the teams involved and believe it is vital to evaluate the outcome of all critically ill Covid-19 patients irrespective of their location.

COVID-19: Intensive care management.

The SARS-coronavirus 2 disease initially reported in December 2019 in China (COVID-19) represents a major challenge for intensive care medicine, due to the high number of ICU admission and the prolonged stay for many patients. Up to 5% of COVID-19 infected patients develop severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation as supportive treatment. Apart from early antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatment, the management of COVID-19 patients is mainly applying protective mechanical ventilation, to support the injured lungs. However recently acquired data and clinical experience suggest that COVID-19-related ARDS presents some specificities that will be summarized in the present article.Copyright © 2020 Editions Medecine et Hygiene. All rights reserved.

Extracorporeal cytokine hemadsorption in severe COVID-19 respiratory failure

Background: At least 20% of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients develop acute hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring admission to intensive care unit in 5-32% of the cases. Hyper-inflammatory activation characterized by immune cell infiltration and elevated levels of cytokines was reported as the main mechanism leading to critical illness and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). CytoSorb is currently used for all the conditions where elevated levels of cytokines are present. Along with the beneficial effect on systemic inflammation, CytoSorb can be easily integrated with all extracorporeal circulation systems. Case Presentation: Here, we present the laboratory and clinical outcomes of 11 patients with microbiological confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. These patients were treated with CytoSorb to remove the excess of cytokine. All patients were male, overweight and only 3 (27%) were over 70 years old. Median age was 62 years and median body mass index was 28. Best supportive care was provided according to hospital guidelines of that moment and included antibiotic therapy, antiretroviral therapy and protective ventilation. Result(s): Cytokines levels were evaluated before and after treatment. A significant reduction of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-1beta was observed. A significant drop of C-reactive protein (CRP) median levels was observed starting from 48 hours after treatment start levels. The decrease in the inflammatory status was associated with a progressive improvement in the respiratory function, with a significant increase in P/F from the first day after the end of the therapy. A similar trend was observed for procalcitonin. Conclusion(s): CytoSorb therapy proved to be safe in COVID-19 patients. A clinical improvement was observed in most of the treated patients despite the severity of the disease. In this study CytoSorb was used empirically for 24- 48 hours based on previous experience in septic shock. The persistence of significant levels of IL-6 and CRP after CytoSorb treatment may suggest that a prolonged treatment can improve the efficacy in controlling COVID-19 hyperinflammatory status.

Tracheoesophageal Fistula Presenting With Gastrostomy Tube Pressurization

Introduction: Patients with COVID pneumonia who require intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation are at risk for complications such as recurrent infection, tracheomalacia, tracheal stenosis, and the development of tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). TEF is a devastating complication where the trachea and esophagus develop an abnormal connection in the lower airway that dramatically increases the mortality of critically ill patients by recurrent aspiration and pneumonias. Though commonly associated with neoplasms another risk is pressure induced ischemia of the common wall between the trachea and esophagus. This can occur due to overinflation of the endotracheal (ET) cuff, especially with concomitant use of a nasogastric tube (NGT). Definitive management requires surgical repair. Case Description/Methods: A 69-year-old male patient presented with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to COVID pneumonia requiring intubation and insertion of an NGT. On day 29 the patient underwent percutaneous enterogastrostomy (PEG) placement and tracheostomy;it was noted intraoperatively that the tracheal mucosa was inflamed and friable. On day 36 bronchoscopy was performed through the tracheostomy tube due to concerns for mucus plugging. Friable mucosa with granulation tissue was seen at the distal end of the tube, so an extra-long tracheostomy tube was exchanged to bypass the granulation tissue. Later that night the ventilator measured a 50% discrepancy between the delivered and exhaled tidal volumes, triggering an alarm. Exam noted distension of the PEG-bag with a fluid meniscus in the tubing moving in sync with each respiration. TEF was considered and bronchoscopic evaluation confirmed a 1-centimeter TEF. The patient underwent successful TEF repair and is slowly recovering (Figure). Discussion(s): Critically ill patients who require prolonged support are at high risk of complications and device related injury. With each device-day there is an increased risk of complications, such as infection, dislodgement, and pressure-related injuries. This case highlights the importance of serial physical examinations as well as understanding possible device related complications. An unexpected finding, such as a persistent air leak, air in a PEG bag, or a fluctuating meniscus should raise suspicion for the development of a serious complication and would warrant prompt confirmatory testing. Our literature review revealed no reports of a PEG tube abnormalities as a presenting finding for TEF.

Acute care treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia with acute respiratory failure

Treatment of COVID-19 patients and their extreme numbers represented an unprecedented challenge for the intensive care system in healthcare facilities throughout the Czech Republic, a country particularly affected by the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A steep increase in the need for intensive care placed an excess burden on bed and staff capacity. For a severe and critical course of COVID-19, bilateral pneumonia with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is pathognomonic. In the intensive care setting, COVID-19 therapy is primarily symptomatic, supporting failing respiratory function to gain time needed to restore it and to repair the lungs. The aggressiveness and comprehensiveness of respiratory support depend on the severity of failure, ranging from simple oxygen therapy, to non-invasive support and mechanical ventilation, to extracorporeal support. By contrast, specific COVID-19 therapy is directly targeted against SARS-CoV-2 or modulates the organism's response to the virus. Primary, virus-induced lung injury may be secondarily complicated by coinfection or superinfection, most commonly bacterial, increasing the severity and lethality of the disease. Therefore, anti-infective therapy is crucial for the prognosis and outlook of intensive care COVID-19 patients. Among nosocomial infections com-plicating COVID-19, ventilator-associated pneumonia (developing in mechanically ventilated patients) is particularly important and challenging, and so are issues related to bacterial resistance and rational antibiotic therapy.Copyright © 2021, Trios spol. s.r.o.. All rights reserved.

A Case Report of Iatrogenic Esophageal Perforation: Complication of Orogastric Tube Placement

Introduction: Orogastric tube insertion is a routine procedure in medical care. However, misplacement of the tube can cause a variety of complications, which can be life threatening in some instances. Case Description/Methods: 71-year-old male presented with dyspnea, fever, chills, cough, and myalgia for 2 weeks. He had tachycardia, tachypnea, and was hypoxic to 66% in room air. He was found to have acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 Pneumonia and was admitted to ICU. But, he continued to be hypoxic and was started on BiPAP. He eventually became altered, and was intubated. Post intubation orogastric tube (OGT) placement was unsuccessful on the first attempt due to resistance. On the second attempt, the nurse was able to advance partially (Figure). But, a chest XR showed OGT in the mediastinum, and OGT was removed. CT of neck and chest revealed pneumomediastinum with possible mid-thoracic esophageal perforation. The patient was started on broad-spectrum antibiotics and thoracic surgery was consulted. Given his mechanical ventilation requirement, surgery deemed him unfit to tolerate thoracotomy and the endoscopic procedure was not available in the hospital. So, recommendation was to manage conservatively. His hospital course was complicated by hypotension requiring vasopressors and metabolic acidosis in setting of acute renal failure requiring CRRT. Code status was changed by the family to Do Not Resuscitate due to his deteriorating condition. Eventually, he had a PEA arrest and was expired. Discussion(s): OGT intubation is performed at hospitals for feeding, medication administration or gastric decompression. Although it is considered a safe procedure, complications can arise due to OGT misplacement or trauma caused by the OGT itself or the intubation process. OGT misplacement is typically endotracheal or intracranial. Misplacement within the upper GI lumen is usually detected by a kink in the oropharynx or esophagus. The subsequent complications are identified by the structure that is perforated (e.g., mediastinitis or pneumothorax). Regardless of whether counteraction is perceived, the physician must be careful not to apply excessive force. The location of the OGT tip should be determined by a chest radiograph;visualization of the tip below the diaphragm verifies appropriate placement. Complications of OGT insertion are uncommon;however, the consequences are potentially serious, and the anatomy of the upper GI tract should be understood by all who are involved in the care.

A free-standing children's hospital helps a post-partum woman needing VV-ECMO during COVID-19 Pandemic when ECMO resources were limited

Our case is a 21 y/o pregnant female, 26weeks gestation who presented to OB triage with COVID-19. She was admitted to OB/GYN unit in acute hypoxic respiratory failure and started on steroids and remdesivir. On hospital day 6, she underwent an emergent c-section for fetal distress due to increasing hypoxia and severe ARDS. As her arterial blood gas being ph 7.17/81/40/29.6/-0.4, lactate 6.8nmol/L with escalating vasoactive medication and ventilator settings;ECMO was decided. However, all adult ECMO resources were limited, even within other adult facilities in Central Florida. Through multidisciplinary discussions amongst OB/GYN, adult ICU, and our pediatric ECMO activation team, it was decided to transfer the patient to our free-standing pediatric hospital. The patient was successfully transferred and cannulated for VV-ECMO. Total ECMO run was 413 hours. On ECMO day #12 patient underwent a tracheostomy. On ECMO day # 17, patient developed headaches and seizure activity in which CT revealed a subdural hemorrhage. She was taken off ECMO and underwent an emergent decompressive craniectomy with hematoma evacuation by our pediatric neurosurgical team. Once stable enough, she was discharged post ECMO day #15 (PICU day #32) to rehabilitation center. Two weeks later she had her bone flap replaced, trach removed, and she walked out of our unit home. This case exudes two key points for discussion. The first point of understanding ECMO physiology allows a team to treat many different patient populations. Although this patient was unusual to our pediatric bedside providers being post-partum, our team knew we could help. The second key point is excellent multidisciplinary teamwork and that communication is essential. At Orlando Health Arnold Palmer Hospital, our ECMO activation team consists of surgeons, pediatric intensivists, CT surgeons, perfusionists, nursing, and administration. We meet virtually to discuss how to execute initiation and daily ECMO treatment plans. There were some on the virtual call that were hesitant in accepting care of this adult due to variety of reasons, saying no would have been the easier answer, but not the right thing to do. What we learned from this case may seem so obvious and simple but very difficult to execute;multidisciplinary teamwork, humility, and open communication gave this patient the ability to walk out of the hospital with her baby. Other pediatric ECMO teams can learn from this case is they too can help in extraordinary times such as during a pandemic when adult recourses are limited.

Comparison of the efficacy and comfort of high-flow nasal cannula with different initial flow settings in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been proven effective in improving patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), but a discussion of its use for initial flow settings still need to be provided. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and comfort evaluation of HFNC with different initial flow settings in patients with AHRF. METHODS: Studies published by October 10, 2022, were searched exhaustively in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed with STATA 17.0 and R software (version 4.2.1). A Bayesian framework was applied for this NMA. Comparisons of competing models based on the deviance information criterion (DIC) were used to select the best model for NMA. The primary outcome is the intubation at day 28. Secondary outcomes included short-term and long-term mortality, comfort score, length of ICU or hospital stay, and 24-h PaO2/FiO2. RESULTS: This NMA included 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 5774 patients. With NIV as the control, the HFNC_high group was significantly associated with lower intubation rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.72 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.56 to 0.93; moderate quality evidence) and short-term mortality (OR 0.81 95% CrI 0.69 to 0.96; moderate quality evidence). Using HFNC_Moderate (Mod) group (mean difference [MD] - 1.98 95% CrI -3.98 to 0.01; very low quality evidence) as a comparator, the HFNC_Low group had a slight advantage in comfort scores but no statistically significant difference. Of all possible interventions, the HFNC_High group had the highest probability of being the best in reducing intubation rates (73.04%), short-term (82.74%) and long-term mortality (67.08%). While surface under the cumulative ranking curve value (SUCRA) indicated that the HFNC_Low group had the highest probability of being the best in terms of comfort scores. CONCLUSIONS: The high initial flow settings (50-60 L/min) performed better in decreasing the occurrence of intubation and mortality, albeit with poor comfort scores. Treatment of HFNC for AHRF patients ought to be initiated from moderate flow rates (30-40 L/min), and individualized flow settings can make HFNC more sensible in clinical practice.

Severe Headache as an Early Manifestation of Brain Involvement in a Patient with Covid-19 Infection

Purpose of study COVID-19 primarily affects the respiratory system from flu-like syndrome to acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Neurological manifestations are uncommon and can result in serious complications. We report a unique case of sudden onset of rapidly progressive encephalopathy in the setting of COVID-19. Methods used Reviewed the manifestations, clinical course, and outcome for a patient presenting with altered mental status secondary to COVID-19. Summary of results A 48-year-old with no significant past medical history presented to the emergency department complaining of severe headache for four days. His vital signs on presentation showed a blood pressure of 154/90, pulse of 114 bpm, temperature of 99.6 degreeF, and oxygen saturation of 97% on room air. Physical exam was unremarkable. Lab work showed elevated D-dimer 8,500 ng/L, Elevated ESR:42, LDH:340 and Ferritin:692. White blood count: 7.59 uL, Platelets 50 x 103 uL. Computer tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest showed bilateral multifocal pneumonia. CT Head was performed and was negative for an acute hemorrhage, hydrocephalus or territorial infarcts. Patient spiked a fever shortly after admission 103degreeF. Patient was started on Ceftriaxone and Azithromycin. Blood and urine cultures were positive for Klebsiella pneumonia. Patient was re-evaluated in the morning and was found altered with associated neck stiffness. Antibiotics were switched to cover for suspected meningitis. Neurology was consulted and recommended lumbar puncture. Within a few hours, the patient's mental status deteriorated and was found to be hypertensive with a blood pressure of 220/110. Repeat CT Head was negative. The patient was tested and found to be positive for COVID-19. Patient further decompensated within a few hours and became unresponsive, pulseless. ACLS was performed and the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit. Conclusions This case report highlights the heterogenous presentation in patients with COVID-19 and the importance of recognizing a new onset, severe headache as the only initial presentation. Headaches in some cases may precede the respiratory symptoms or may be the only manifestations in COVID-19 patients and it is crucial to be aware of the neurological complications and the rapid decompensation these patients may undergo if not recognized early.

Ventilatory support in Covid-19 pneumonia.

The Covid-19 pandemic led to a major influx of patients suffering from acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, which conducted intensivists to adapt ICU structures and question respiratory support strategies. Available data suggest that pathophysiology of Covid-19 associated - acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is substantially similar to the pathophysiology of ARDS unrelated to Covid-19. Specific vascular injuries may however be more frequent during Covid-19 and some patients may present a major alteration in hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. To date, ventilatory support strategies of patients with Covid-19 should be in line with guidelines for ARDS unrelated to Covid-19, including in particular a cautious evaluation of positive end-expiratory pressure effects.Copyright © SRLF 2021.

Awake Prone Positioning in Non-Intubated Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning (APP) has been advocated to improve oxygenation and prevent intubation of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This paper aims to synthesize the available evidence on the efficacy of APP. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of proportional outcomes from observational studies to compare intubation rate in patients treated with APP or with standard care. RESULTS: A total of 46 published and 4 unpublished observational studies that included 2,994 subjects were included, of which 921 were managed with APP and 870 were managed with usual care. APP was associated with significant improvement of oxygenation parameters in 381 cases of 19 studies that reported this outcome. Among the 41 studies assessing intubation rates (870 subjects treated with APP and 852 subjects treated with usual care), the intubation rate was 27% (95% CI 19-37%) as compared to 30% (95% CI 20-42%) (P = .71), even when duration of application, use of adjunctive respiratory assist device (high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive ventilation), and severity of oxygenation deficit were taken into account. There appeared to be a trend toward improved mortality when APP was compared with usual care (11% vs 22%), which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: APP was associated with improvement of oxygenation but did not reduce the intubation rate in subjects with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19. This finding is limited by the high heterogeneity and the observational nature of included studies. Randomized controlled clinical studies are needed to definitively assess whether APP could improve key outcome such as intubation rate and mortality in these patients.

Efficacy and safety of awake prone positioning in the treatment of non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, prone positioning has been widely applied for non-intubated, spontaneously breathing patients. However, the efficacy and safety of prone positioning in non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure remain unclear. We aimed to systematically analyze the outcomes associated with awake prone positioning (APP). Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from January 1, 2020, to June 3, 2022. This study included adult patients with acute respiratory failure caused by COVID-19. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome was the reported cumulative intubation risk across randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the effect estimates were calculated as risk ratios (RRs; 95% confidence interval [CI]). Results: A total of 495 studies were identified, of which 10 fulfilled the selection criteria, and 2294 patients were included. In comparison to supine positioning, APP significantly reduced the need for intubation in the overall population (RR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.95). The two groups showed no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events (RR=1.16, 95% CI: 0.48-2.76). The meta-analysis revealed no difference in mortality between the groups (RR=0.93, 95% CI: 0.77-1.11). Conclusions: APP was safe and reduced the need for intubation in patients with respiratory failure associated with COVID-19. However, it did not significantly reduce mortality in comparison to usual care without prone positioning.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated patients admitted to a Respiratory Intensive Care Unit

Background: While vaccination against COVID-19 shows high efficacy in preventing Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, its impact on the severity of patients admitted to an ICU is still unclear. Aims and Objectives: To compare clinical characteristics and outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated COVID-19 patients admitted to a Respiratory ICU (RICU). Method(s): A prospective observational cohort study including adult patients admitted to the SARS-CoV-2 RICU of the University Hospital of Padova for hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure (hARF) between October 1st, and December 31st, 2021. Result(s): Among 42 vaccinated patients, 40 (95.2%) had completed vaccination cycle;no one had received a buster dose. Vaccinated patients were older than their counterparts. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 vaccination seems not to significantly reduce the clinical severity of patients admitted to a RICU for hARF.

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus non-invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV), have been widely used in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Their impact on clinical outcomes of COVID-19 is uncertain. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of HFNC vs. NIV in COVID-19-related AHRF. Method(s): PubMed and Embase were searched through December 15, 2021, for eligible studies comparing the outcomes of HFNC vs. NIV in patients with COVID-19-related AHRF. Our primary outcome was intubation rate. The secondary outcomes were mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), and changes in PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained by using a random-effect model. Result(s): Eleven studies involving 1380 patients (525 received HFNC and 855 received NIV) were included. There were no differences in intubation rate, mortality, or LOS between the two groups (Figure). HFNC achieved a lower level of PaO2/FiO2 ratio improvement than NIV (MD 0.40 days, 95% CI 0.08, 0.72, P=0.02, Figure). Conclusion(s): Our study demonstrated that despite NIV achieving a higher level of PaO2/FiO2 ratio improvement than HFNC, HFNC is non-inferior to NIV in intubation, mortality, and LOS among patients with COVID-19-related AHRF. Large-scale RCTs are needed to validate our findings.

ERS International Congress 2022 Abstracts

The proceedings contain 3270 papers. The topics discussed include: the impact of age and gender on mortality from COVID-19 at A UK hospital;vaccinated COVID-19 patients admitted in a Tunisian ICU: clinical features and outcome;pneumothorax - a life-threatening complication in patients with cystic fibrosis;impact of combined non-invasive support strategies use during acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19;early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care units: results of a Saudi-wide national survey;awake prone positioning in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure from COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial;amount and distribution of parenchymal abnormalities at CT-scan do not predict awake prone position outcome in COVID-19;impact of dexamethasone on pathogen profile of COVID-19 patients requiring intensive care: a multicenter retrospective study;higher crystalloids volumes predict adverse outcomes in emergency department patients with blunt thoracic trauma;and STUMBL score for emergency department safe discharge of patients with minor blunt thoracic trauma.

Awake Prone Positioning in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure from COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: The efficacy and safety of awake prone positioning (APP) in hypoxemic patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear. Aim(s): To evaluate the efficacy and safety of APP in non-intubated adults with COVID-19. Method(s): We performed a pragmatic, international, randomized trial at 21 centers in Canada, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the United States between May 19, 2020, and May 18, 2021. Eligible patients were hospitalized adults with COVID-19 requiring >40% oxygen. Patients were randomized to APP (n=205) or usual care (n=195). The primary outcome was intubation by day 30. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 60 days, ventilation-free days at 30 days, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital-free days at 60 days, adverse events, and serious adverse events. Result(s): Patients in the APP group proned for a median of 4.8 hours per day (IQR 1.8 to 8.0) in the first 4 days. By day 30, 70/205 patients (34.1%) in the APP group and 79/195 (40.5%) in the control group were intubated (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81;95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59 to 1.12). APP did not reduce mortality at 60 days (HR 0.93;95% CI 0.62 to 1.40) and had no effect on days alive invasively or noninvasively ventilated at 30 days, or days out of ICU or hospital at 60 days. There were no serious adverse events in either group. A prespecified subgroup analysis suggested that APP reduced intubation among patients with SpO2:FiO2 >150 (HR of 0.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.87) but not among patients with SpO2:FiO2 <150 (HR 1.02;95% CI 0.70 to 1.48;P-interaction= 0.03). Conclusion(s): APP did not significantly reduce intubation at 30 days or mortality at 60 days overall, but may be effective in patients with SpO2:FiO2 >150.

Clinical Profile and Outcomes of COVID19 confirmed cases with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Undergoing Protocol directed assisted Prone Positioning at Lung Center of the Philippines (LCP)from May 1, 2020 to April 30, 2021

Background: Prone positioning is an emerging tool in the care provided to patients infected with COVID-19 with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) at Lung Center of the Philippines (LCP). Objective(s): This study aimed to characterize the clinical profile of COVID-19 confirmed cases undergoing protocol directed assisted prone positioning. Method(s): This retrospective single-arm cohort study involved 87 eligible patients seen from May 1, 2020 to April 30, 2021 by reviewing their medical records. Result(s): Patients were predominantly middle-aged (49.4%) males (69.0%) with normal BMI (56.3%). Hypertension (59.8%) was the most prevalent comorbidity. Patients were admitted because of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure that required respiratory support. Biochemical markers of inflammation and disease severity, such as LDH, D-dimers and ferritin were consistently high in our study population. On average, the duration of symptoms before intubation was 7.7 days (SD=3.7) while the number of days of illness prior to prone positioning was 10.1 (SD=4.9). In terms of clinical outcomes, 94.3% of the patients had no accidental extubation. However, the all-cause mortality accounted for 29.9%. The mean number of days intubated was 14.1 days (SD=9.3) while the average length of hospital stay was 18.1 days (SD=11.4). Conclusion(s): This study revealed a broad picture and proportion of COVID-19 with ARDS undergoing protocol directed assisted prone positioning. Prone position is safe and impacts the clinical outcome of patients.

Incidence of Air Leaks in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19.

Subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum are well-known complications of invasive ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. We determined the incidences of air leaks that were visible on available chest images in a cohort of critically ill patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) in a single-center cohort in the Netherlands. A total of 712 chest images from 154 patients were re-evaluated by a multidisciplinary team of independent assessors; there was a median of three (2-5) chest radiographs and a median of one (1-2) chest CT scans per patient. The incidences of subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothoraxes and pneumomediastinum present in 13 patients (8.4%) were 4.5%, 4.5%, and 3.9%. The median first day of the presence of an air leak was 18 (2-21) days after arrival in the ICU and 18 (9-22)days after the start of invasive ventilation. We conclude that the incidence of air leaks was high in this cohort of COVID-19 patients, but it was fairly comparable with what was previously reported in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in the pre-COVID-19 era.

Long-term outcomes of patients with COVID-19 treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation or usual respiratory support: follow-up study of the Helmet-COVID randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether helmet noninvasive ventilation compared to usual respiratory support reduces 180-day mortality and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: This is a pre-planned follow-up study of the Helmet-COVID trial. In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial, adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (n = 320) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were randomized to receive helmet noninvasive ventilation or usual respiratory support. The modified intention-to-treat population consisted of all enrolled patients except three who were lost at follow-up. The study outcomes were 180-day mortality, EuroQoL (EQ)-5D-5L index values, and EQ-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, non-survivors were assigned a value of 0 for EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS. RESULTS: Within 180 days, 63/159 patients (39.6%) died in the helmet noninvasive ventilation group compared to 65/158 patients (41.1%) in the usual respiratory support group (risk difference - 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] - 12.3, 9.3, p = 0.78). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, patients in the helmet noninvasive ventilation and the usual respiratory support groups did not differ in EQ-5D-5L index values (median 0.68 [IQR 0.00, 1.00], compared to 0.67 [IQR 0.00, 1.00], median difference 0.00 [95% CI - 0.32, 0.32; p = 0.91]) or EQ-VAS scores (median 70 [IQR 0, 93], compared to 70 [IQR 0, 90], median difference 0.00 (95% CI - 31.92, 31.92; p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Helmet noninvasive ventilation did not reduce 180-day mortality or improve HRQoL compared to usual respiratory support among patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia.